Theories of Intelligence in Psychology

Theories of Intelligence: Top 6 Theories |Psychology

Theories of Intelligence in Psychology

Read this article to learn about the theories of intelligence.

Theory of Intelligence # 1. Spearman’s Two Factor Theory of Intelligence:

Spearman gave his two factor theory of intelligence in 1904. “No single event in the history of mental testing has proved to be such momentous importance as his famous two-factor theory”—(Guilford-Psycho-metric methods).

According to Spearman the mental traits are not independent; there is a common element in all our cognitive abilities. This is the basis of his famous two-factor theory of intelligence—the theory that every different intellectual activity involves a general factor, which it shares with all other intellectual activities, and a specific factor, which it shares with none.

Spearman declines to designate this general factor as general intelligence, which seems to him to be “a word with so many meanings that finally it has none.

He prefers to denote it by a letter “g”, and the specific factor by “s”.

It is true that Spearman’s ‘g’ is Often identified with what we commonly term “general intelligence”, but it is well to remember that it is primarily a mathematical quantity derived by mathematical processes from measured data.

Mathematically, Spearman’s theory, in brief, is that every individual measurement of every intellectual ability may be resolved into two factors, one of which is a “general factor” (g) common to all the abilities measured, and the others “specific factor” (s) peculiar to each particular ability. This statement may be translated into mathematical form by representing the score (S) of an individual on a given mental test by the simple equation

S = a1g + a2S,

where the letters “a1” and “a2” represent the “weights” or “loads” of the two factors ‘g’ and ‘s’, respectively.

Theory of Intelligence # 2. Mathematical Basis of Spearman’s Theory:

The complete mathematical proof of Spearman’s theory is rather intricate and difficult to follow, but the main line of argument may be readily understood from a simple example. Let us begin, as Spearman did, by correlating the results of a number of tests and arranging the co-efficient or correlation systematically in what is known as a ‘correlation-matrix’.

Let us take 5 tests- a, b, c, d, e, with the titles given below and arrange their “inter-correlations” in a matrix form:

We may also express this in an equivalent algebraic form:

The start of Spearman’s enquiry was “a curious observation” that the cross-products of any square block of four coefficients were approximately equal. For example, from the set of coefficients

we get by cross-multiplication (.48 x .35) = (.40 x .42) or (.48 x .35) – (.40 x.42) =0;

or from another set, (.56 x .30) – (.40 x .42) = 0. A square block of four coefficients Spearman termed a tetrad and the equation expressing the equality of the cross-products the tetrad equation.

In algebraic terms the first of the above tetrad equations would read:

tab.cd = rac.rbd – rad.rbc = 0; and the second

tab.cd = rab.rcd – rad.rbc = 0

The rest of the argument consisted in demonstrating that if intellectual abilities are due to the presence of two factors, one ‘general’ and the other ‘specific’—in other words if the equation S = a1g + a2s holds good, then the tetrad equation rab.rcd – rad.

rbc = 0 must be satisfied; and, conversely, if the tetrad equation is satisfied for any four abilities a, b, c, d, then the equation S = a1g + a2s must be true, and, consequently, the said abilities are divisible into two factors, one of which is a “general” factor common to four abilities.

Spearman and Holzinger later on supplied a method to find out if any departure from the zero requirement of the tetrad equation is due to a “real” difference or to “errors of sampling”.

The two-factor theory now rests on a firm mathematical basis. The amount of correlation between any two tests is determined by the extent to which the two tests are loaded with G.

Another chart of inter-correlation of 6 tests is given below, arranged in the hierarchical order.

The chart shows the weightages:

More clearly, in this table the variables have been arranged in order of the rank of the sums. In every column the coefficients are graded from high to low. This is called by Spearman the hierarchical order. The tests A and B have a relatively higher correlation, that is, they have much in common in G, whereas tests A and C have little correlation, because they have small loadings with G.

Spearman and his followers later admitted the existence of some group factors “verbal ability, numerical ability, and possible factor of mental speed, mechanical ability, attention and imagination”. “Tests G and H have a higher correlation than that attributable to G alone. Such an additional common factor as in tests G and H became known as a group factor”.

Spearman’s two factor theory was criticised vehemently by Thorndike. E. L.

Thorndike devised a test—the C A V D (Completion, Arithmetic, Vocabulary, and Understanding of directions and discourse), as a basis of the theory that intelligence is a composite of many different abilities interconnecting in the brain.

Thorndike proposed three kinds of intelligence— Social, Concrete and Abstract. This was probably the first multifactor theory of intelligence, though not the results of a factor analysis of ability tests.

Theory of Intelligence # 3. Sampling Theory of Godfrey Thomson:

In Britain, Spearman’s most active critic has been Godfrey Thomson. He claims that the two factor theory is not the only possible explanation of the facts.

According to him these facts may be explained on the hypothesis that there are multiple or group factors in intellectual abilities, each of which is common to a limited number of different intellectual ability, and is, therefore, less restricted in its range than any of Spearman’s specific factors, and yet not of universal range as is his G factor.

G. H. Thomson’s theory is known as the sampling theory. According to the sampling theory, every test samples a certain range of the elementary human abilities; some with a wide range, some with a narrow range. He believes in a “g” factor or general ability, but it is not a basic entity. It is a constant combination of the ability elements.

Similarly, the group factors are combinations, more or less stable, of more limited collections of elements, specific factors are composed of elements that restrict their appearance to single tests— (G. H. Thomson—The Factorial Analysis of Human Ability).

Theory of Intelligence # 4. Multifactor Theory:

The multifactor theory holds that the performance on a certain test depends on one or more common factors, each weighted according to its significance for success in the task.

The theory is various methods of factor analysis:

“Though Charles Spearman has been credited with being the father of factor analysis, he and his followers did not want to admit importance of group factors. They played up the role of ‘G’ factor. This was especially true of Cyril Burt, Philip Vernon, and R. B. Cattell.”

“It was Thurstone who popularized the multifactor theory and methods in psychology. Geometrically, the multiple factor model is a set of dimensions or vectors extending from the same origin, each vector representing a common factor.”

“The nearer to a certain factor vector a test vector lies, the greater is the involvement of the test with that factor, the greater is its “loading” on that factor. A factor loading is also the correlation between a test (an empirical variable) and the factor (a purely ideal variable).”

In short, he applied the centroid method of factorization and oblique rotation of correlations among many different cognitive measures. Thurstone deduced seven primary abilities.

His deduction was an analysis of Aptitude Research Project experiences.

The abilities or factors found are “Space, perceptual speed, numerical facility, verbal compre­hension, rote memory, induction, word fluency, deduction and general reasoning.”

Theory of Intelligence # 5. Hierarchical Theories:

British psychologists Cyril Burt (1949) and Vernon (1960) gave an alternative scheme for the organisation of factors.

At the top of the hierarchy, Vernon places that ‘G’ factor or the general cognitive factor.

At the next level he places two broad group factors, corresponding to verbal-educational (v: ed) and practical-mechanical (k: m.) aptitudes. These major factors may be further sub-divided.

The verbal educational factor may be sub-divided into verbal and numerical sub-factors, and the practical mechanical factor into mechanical information, spatial, and psychomotor ability.

At the lowest level of the hierarchy are the special factors.

“Such a hierarchical structure thus resembles an inverted genealogical tree, with ‘g’ at the top, ’s’ factors at the bottom, and progressively narrower group factors in between.”

The graphic representation of Spearman’s two-factor theory (A), of the multifactor theory (B), and of the hierarchical theory (C), showing correlated tests is given below:

Vernon’s theory is a compromise formula, between Spearman’s two factors and Thurstone’s multifactor theory. It retains G factor, and relegates Thurstone’s and Guilford’s structure of intellect to sub-ordinate level.

Theory of Intelligence # 6. R. B. Cattell’s Theory of Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence:

According to R.B. Cattell, general intelligence is composed of two factors— fluid intelligence (G) and crystallized intelligence (Gc). This is similar to Vernon’s distinction of intelligence A which is product of heredity and intelligence B, which is due to environment. Fluid intelligence, ‘intelligence A’, depends more on heredity and crystallized ability on environment.

Both types of ability are concerned with the ability to perceive relationships, fluid-ability is general to many fields, and crystallized intelligence is specific to certain fields, school learning.

Fluid intelligence is used more in tasks requiring adaptation to new situations, while crystallized intelligence is used to tasks where habits have become fixed. He applied oblique rotations in his factor analysis.

These two factors—fluid and crystallized intelligence—are distinct but correlated.

Jean Piaget has given a theory of intelligence (cognitive development), not factor analysis.

He believes that cognitive development takes place in a series of four stages – Sensory motor stage (up to 2 years) when the child learns to exercise simple reflexes and coordinate various perceptions, leading to general operational stage (from 11 to 15 years).

During adolescence the child can perform more abstract operation. Intelli­gence increases up to the date of 15 years, it is achievement that increases after 15 years, intelligence, according to him, is the ability to solve new problems.

Источник: https://www.psychologydiscussion.net/psychology/theories-of-intelligence-top-6-theories-psychology/1502

What Are The Different Theories Of Intelligence in Psychology?

Theories of Intelligence in Psychology
Summary:

These three different theories of intelligence will help you discover your individual cognitive strengths and propel you on a path towards better control over your own life.

Scientists have been studying the brain for hundreds of years, and still, they’ve only scratched the surface. We’ve yet to figure out what this remarkable mass of advanced biological material is capable of.

Different psychologists have proposed competing for theories of intelligence over the years. These theories have proven to be useful in our understanding of the brain.

There are several unique approaches to the intelligence we will explore in this article. You’ll get a better idea of what intelligence is and what the scientists and psychologists have to say about the topic.

Discovering your individual cognitive strengths will propel you on a path towards better control over your own life. You can hone your skills, step into your true self, and live your life from a place of greater self-awareness.

After reading this article, you should be able to answer the following questions:

Let’s begin!

My work is about transcending. It’s about ending this mass hypnosis that we’re not enough, that we’re not smart enough, that we’re not good enough. I want to disrupt and shatter that limiting belief.

— Jim Kwik

Intelligence is a complex thing to define. But it can be broadly thought of as the measure of a person’s ability to master a specific cognitive function, such as problem-solving, logical reasoning, and self-awareness.

We’re going to explore three competing theories of intelligence to help you understand the different cognitive strengths you may possess:

  • Spearman’s Two-Factor Theory of Intelligence
  • Sternberg’s Triarchic Theory of Intelligence
  • Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligence

Charles Spearman, an English psychologist, noticed that students who did well in one subject area tended to do well in corresponding subjects.

He concluded that human beings possess a generalized form of intelligence, known as a g-factor, which can lead to other specialized forms of intelligence, measured by the s-factor.

G-factor is a sum of s-factor scores that measure a person’s abilities in one particular area. Generally excepted s-factors of intelligence include memory, attention, verbal comprehension, spatial skills, and abstract reasoning.

The g-factor and the s-factor are two parts of Spearman’s Two-factor theory of intelligence.

IQ tests, which measure general cognitive ability, are derived from his theory of general intelligence.

American psychologist, Robert Sternberg, made his name by proposing the triarchic theory of intelligence. This theory asserts that human intelligence can be divided into three types: analytical, creative, and practical intelligence.

Analytical intelligence refers to a person’s ability to assess information and use deductive reasoning to arrive at plausible solutions.

Creative intelligence draws on a person’s ability to create something from nothing or to do something in a unique and novel way.

Practical intelligence is the intelligence of common sense reasoning, commonly referred to as “street smarts”.

Sternberg believed that a balanced measure of all three forms of intelligence would result in the greatest life success.

In contrast to the two theories of intelligence we’ve just examined, Gardner’s theory proposes nine different types of intelligence.

Howard Gardner is an American psychologist who first proposed his theory in the 1980s. He counters the standard psychological view of generalized intelligence by suggesting nine unique forms of intelligence:

1. Naturalistic intelligence

Naturalistic intelligence is the intelligence of the natural world. People who possess naturalistic intelligence have keen outdoor sensibilities, are born wayfinders, and have a strong connection with Mother Nature.

2. Musical intelligence

People who are musically intelligent have a natural draw to all things acoustic and musical. They have a talent for identifying sound, pitch, rhythm, and timbre.

3. Logical-Mathematical Intelligence

We’re all familiar with this form of intelligence. If you are logically intelligent, you’re able to use deductive analysis, logical reasoning, and executive planning to your advantage. Those with this form of intelligence work well with numbers and are skilled problem solvers.

4. Existential Intelligence

Those with existential intelligence have a knack for tackling the big questions of life. What is life? Where does it come from? Who am I? What should I do with my life? If you possess existential intelligence, you have a philosophical mind and have no trouble grappling with abstract concepts and theories.

5. Interpersonal Intelligence

If you possess great interpersonal abilities, you possess emotional intelligence. People with this intelligence have a natural ability to understand the thoughts, actions, and motives of others.

6. Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence

This type of intelligence is displayed by those with great control over their physical bodies. Many dancers, athletes, and physical therapists possess kinesthetic intelligence. These people have mastered control over the physical form and are effective physical communicators.

People with linguistic intelligence are skilled wordsmiths. They’re able to use words to convey different feelings, ideas, and theories with ease. They also have a predisposition for visual learning, so they can quickly master new languages.

8. Intrapersonal Intelligence

Intrapersonal intelligence is the intelligence of the self. True self-awareness is rare in today’s world, and those with intrapersonal intelligence know themselves more intimately than any other. This is the intelligence of introspection and self-knowing.

9. Visual-Spatial Intelligence

Those with visual-spatial intelligence relate well to the world around them. They are natural-born navigators and possess a keen understanding of the visual world. They often pick up on fine details others are unaware of and can manipulate three-dimensional images in their mind’s eye.

We’ve given you the rundown of three different theories of intelligence. So, the question is: which theory is best?

There’s really no one-size-fits-all when it comes to intelligence. Spearman’s theory of generalized intelligence remains one of the most recognized, but newer theories, Gardner’s and Sternberg’s, offer new and promising insights.  

While IQ tests remain the standardized test of intelligence, this may not always be the case.

As our world changes and new theories of intelligence continue to emerge, we may find that our assumptions about human intelligence aren’t quite what we once thought.

Источник: https://blog.mindvalley.com/theories-of-intelligence/

Psychologydo
Добавить комментарий

;-) :| :x :twisted: :smile: :shock: :sad: :roll: :razz: :oops: :o :mrgreen: :lol: :idea: :grin: :evil: :cry: :cool: :arrow: :???: :?: :!: